|
STAT 6180
Advanced Mathematical Statistics II

STAT 6180 is the second semester of a two-semester graduate sequence on
Mathematical Statistics. This second course is a rigorous exploration of the
foundations of statistics, using the concepts of probability learned in the
first course.

Course Syllabus
| Date
Assigned |
Date
Due |
Homework |
| 9/1/09 |
9/8/09 |
- Download the R statistical language.
http://www.r-project.org/ .
Click on the link under
"Download" on the left of the screen, choose a mirror site, then
follow directions to download and install R.
Type the following in R, to make sure it's
working. You should observe three random numbers between 0
and 1, and then the same numbers put in ascending order.
x <-
runif(3, min=0, max=1)
x
y <- sort(x)
y
- p. 236 #5.1.1, 5.1.2ac, 5.1.3bcd, 5.1.4 bcd(confidence interval
part)
- p. 247 #5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.8, 5.2.14 (note typo:
midrange is (Y1+Y3)/2), 5.2.23b, 5.2.25, 5.2.28a
|
| 9/8/09 |
9/15/09 |
- p. 201 #4.1.7, 4.1.10, 4.1.12, 4.1.25, 4.1.26
- p. 207 #4.2.2, 4.2.4
|
| 9/15/09 |
9/22/09 |
- p 218 # 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.5, 4.3.7, 4.3.11, 4.3.16
- p 225 # 4.4.1, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10
- The following set of commands generates 2000 random uniform numbers,
rearranges them into 2 rows and 1000 columns, then plots the histogram
of the column means (2 uniform numbers per mean).
> x <- runif(2000,
min=0, max=1)
> dim(x) <- c(2,1000)
> hist(colMeans(x))
Use similar commands to display histograms for n=5, 10, 100.
Then generate exponential random variables with
rate 2, and display histograms of sample means for n=2, 5, 10, 100.
Comment. Then do the same, but using Cauchy random variables instead of
exponential. Comment again. Why don't the Cauchy random
variables behave the same as the others? (You will need these
commands: x <- rexp(2000, rate=2)
x <- rcauchy(2000) )
|
| 9/22/09 |
9/29/09 |
p 260 #5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.4.5, 5.4.6, 5.4.9, 5.4.14 |
| 9/29/09 |
10/6/09 |
- p 270 #5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.8, 5.5.9, 5.5.11
- p277 #5.6.4, 5.6.5, 5.6.6, 5.6.8
- In class, S was a binomial random variable with n=100, and
unknown p. We found the exact values of the power function for a
test that H0:p=.8 vs H1:p<.8. We decided to reject if S<=74,
which gave us a significance level of 0.0875. We found power
function values of 0.4465 for p=.75, 0.8369 for p=.7, and 0.9988 for
p=.6.
Suppose we want to run this test many times to see for ourselves
the rejection rates. In R, go to File, then New Script.
Type the following into the new window that opens:
x <- rbinom(1000, 100, .8)
y <- (x<=74)
sum(y)
The first command creates 1000 observations of a binomial random
variable with n=100, p=.8. (After running the commands, try
typing x by itself at the carat prompt, and you will see the list.)
The second tests each against the cutoff, and makes a list of TRUE
and FALSE values. (See this by typing y at the prompt). The third
counts the TRUE values (a TRUE is recorded as a 1, a FALSE as a 0,
so adding them counts the TRUEs).
Go to Edit, then Run All. Repeat a few times. Then change
the value of p to 0.75, 0.7, 0.6, and whatever other values you
want. How does the behavior of the test change?
|
| 10/6/09 |
10/13/09 |
Midterm Exam |
| 10/13/09 |
10/27/09 |
p284 # 5.7.2, 5.7.3, 5.7.4, 5.7.5, 5.7.6 p 294 # 5.8.1, 5.8.2, 5.8.5,
5.8.7 |
| 10/27/09 |
11/3/09 |
p 317 # 6.1.1, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.1.7, 6.1.9 p330 # 6.2.1 |
| 11/3/09 |
11/10/09 |
p 330 #6.2.2, 6.2.7, 6.2.8, 6.2.9, 6.2.12, 6.2.14 |
| 11/10/09 |
11/17/09 |
p 339 #6.3.5, 6.3.8, 6.3.9 p 350 #6.4.1, 6.4.2 |
| 11/17/09 |
11/24/09 |
p 356 #6.5.2, 6.5.3 p379 # 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.4, 7.2.8 |
R code used in class:

Audio
|