The Dead at Antietam

 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
     
 

 
 

 

 
   
     
THE BLOODY STRUGGLE

Although radicals on both sides had agitated the slavery and Southern nationalism issues for years, most white Americans North and South hoped for some peaceful way out of their sectional dispute.  Many hoped for a settlement even after Lincoln’s election in November, 1860, and South Carolina’s immediate move to secede from the Union in December.  During spring of 1861, Congress tried one more time to broker a compromise, while several well-meaning Americans organized a peace convention.  Ft. Sumter in April put an end to such efforts, and the war was on.

It was a war of gradually increasing intensity.  When it began, Confederates wanted only to protect their territory from Union invasion, while Unionists wanted only to defeat secessionist political radicalism.  In keeping with these limited aims, General of the Army, Winfield Scott, developed what came to be known as the Anaconda Plan that hinged almost entirely on a naval blockade (thereby ensuring that most Southern civilians would never see a soldier in blue).  Other Unionists wanted the army to take Richmond, VA, national capital of the Confederacy, and thus take out the political apparatus of the new nation, leaving everything else untouched.  In 1861, neither Union nor Confederacy wanted to make war against civilians or property, or to end the institution of slavery (much to the anger of abolitionists and African Americans). 

But such a light touch was not to be.  As time progressed, it became increasingly clear that neither side really had the ability to win, at least not without a long and brutal war of attrition.  This was true, first, because the armies of the time lacked the capacity to produce a decisive victory in battle.  The Union and Confederate forces could produce incredibly bloody combats like Shiloh, Second Manassas, Chancellorsville, or Antietam.  The soldiers killed and maimed thousands, but even the victorious armies in these battles found themselves as butchered by winning as their opponents were by defeat.  No one could gain decisive advantage. 

In addition to this, victory was elusive because the two major theaters of war—northern Virginia and the west—cancelled each other out.  In the east, Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia frustrated several attempts by its Northern opponent to capture the Confederate capital and to bring this main Southern army to bay.  Lee, Stonewall Jackson, James Longstreet, JEB Stuart and their men dominated the contest in this theater until Ulysses S. Grant, in the spring and summer of 1864, found a way to blunt Confederate strength (a pure war of attrition).  Although Lee’s success was due in large part to his tactical brilliance and the efficiency of his subordinate commanders, geography helped immensely.  The Virginia theater was very compact, allowing Lee to concentrate his men into one, large, hard-hitting striking force.  As well, the several major rivers in northern Virginia ran west to east across any Union army’s line of march, and rivers were a significant barrier system for nineteenth-century armies (as they are now).

Geography worked very differently in the western theater.  Because it was bounded by the Appalachian mountains, the Mississippi River, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Ohio, the area was simply huge.  It taxed Confederate resources beyond their limits to defend it.  Furthermore, unlike Virginia, the major river systems (the Mississippi, the Tennessee, and the Cumberland) were easily navigated highways into the Confederate interior.  They were ready-made, easily secured avenues of invasion, which railroads into the interior then supplemented.  Although sustaining thrusts into the deep South proved difficult because of ever-lengthening supply lines, and because of the efficiency of Confederate cavalry raiders like Nathan Bedford Forrest, the overall situation in the west produced a gradually building Union victory. 

With the west thus balanced against east, and battles between the armies productive of little but heaps of bodies and body parts, the Civil War deepened into a war of full-fledged attrition.  Whatever political leaders might say about emancipation, the war process itself ground slavery to death.  Soldiers, in their frustration, turned more and more into making war on the civilian sector.  This civilian sector itself produced an unregulated guerilla war in the Confederacy, along with sabotage and riots in the North.  By 1865, the war had generated a level of brutality and a willingness to experiment with social revolution that were the stuff only of nightmares, revolutionary fantasizing, or insane musings in 1861.      

For more information on the war years: Timeline and Resources